The indictment was the third secured by Special Counsel John Durham, who has been probing the origins of the FBI investigation that looked at whether Trump’s campaign was collaborating with Russia in 2016.Įarlier, Danchenko's lawyer, Mark Schamel, said that the 39-page indictment “presents a false narrative designed to humiliate and slander a renowned expert in business intelligence.” The court set a tentative trial date of April 2022. He was released on a $100,000 bond earlier he had been ordered to turn over his passport. Igor Danchenko’s plea on November 10 came nearly a week after his indictment by a U.S. Danchenko - who was not identified by name in the watchdog report - had revealed to FBI investigators during a 2017 interview about the dossier's origins and veracity - "potentially serious problems with Steele’s descriptions of information in his reports."īut those qualms from Danchenko were omitted from the final three surveillance applications, making the dossier appear more credible than even one of its own sources thought it was, according to the report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz.ĭanchenko, who previously worked for the Brookings Institution, has himself suggested that the information he offered to Steele was not meant to be portrayed as indisputable fact.A U.S.-based Russian analyst who gathered information for the so-called Steele Dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and Russia pleaded innocent to charges of lying to FBI agents about the origins of his research. The Justice Department's inspector general has faulted the FBI and the Justice Department for their handling of the dossier. Trump’s Justice Department appointed Durham as Trump claimed the investigation of campaign ties to Russia was a witch hunt and pointed to the dossier, some of which remains uncorroborated or has been discredited, as evidence of a tainted probe driven by Democrats.īut the dossier had no role in the launching of the Trump-Russia investigation and special counsel Robert Mueller ultimately found questionable ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, but not sufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges.ĭemocrats have lambasted the Durham probe as politically motivated, but the Biden administration has not stopped it. The case was brought as part of special counsel John Durham's investigation into the origins of the FBI's probe into ties between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.ĭownload the FOX 5 DC News App for Local Breaking News and Weatherīoth the dossier and the Durham probe are politically charged. investigative firm and subsequently passed to the FBI.Ĭourt documents catalogue what prosecutors believe constituted misinformation to investigators – including Danchenko’s claim that he had no connection to a liaison with extensive ties to the Democratic Party. investigative firm that was then included in reports prepared by the U.K. ![]() ![]() READ MORE: Robert Mueller tells Congress he did not clear Trump of obstruction of justiceĪccording to the indictment, in March, May, June, October and November of 2017, Danchenko made false statements regarding the sources of certain information that he provided to a U.K. Steele was hired by a firm working on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. ![]() (Photo by TOLGA AKMEN/AFP via Getty Images) Former UK intelligence officer Christopher Steele arrives at the High Court in London on July 24, 2020, to attend his defamation trial brought by Russian tech entrepreneur Alexej Gubarev.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |